Hey, don't take my word for it. This is coming straight from John Coleman, the founder of The Weather Channel. That's right, he's not an actor, a musician, a politician, not a screeching nutcase, nor an intellectually dishonest attention hound. Chances are, he even received better grades in science than The Goracle.
I always thought "Science" was a search for knowledge, dependent on analysis and debate. So why are these pseudo-scientists trying to stifle dissent? Challenging the Global Warming Alarmists' theories isn't akin to Holocaust Revisionism. According to them, this is a threat to our future, a current challenge for us to overcome, and we must make sacrifices to ensure our children can inhabit this dying world. Are we or the many scientists with views similar to John Coleman's not allowed to participate in this discussion? Are we just supposed to sit back, give away our freedom of choice (such as deciding what you want to drive, how you want to heat your house, whether or not you need to recycle your own human waste for drinking water), and be dictated to by some Washington Bureaucrats and Hollywood's Useful Idiots and Limousine Liberals?